Eyewear is a category where the headline duty is modest but the stacked landed cost may not be, because much of the production base sits in origins now carrying additional tariff layers. A meaningful share of sunglasses and frames is produced in China, where Section 301 duties and any current US tariff actions that apply can layer on top of the base rate, so a low single-digit base duty can translate into a noticeably higher effective rate per unit. For a low-AOV accessory often bought on impulse, that gap tends to land on margin rather than being absorbed in a high sticker price. The exact figure depends on the specific ten-digit HS code and the country of origin.
Representative 2026 estimate stacking base MFN duty (USITC HTS 2026 Rev.10), Section 301 on China-origin goods (USTR), Section 232 on autos and steel/aluminum/copper articles (CRS IN12545), and the 10% Section 122 surcharge that expires 2026-07-24 and is under appeal (Skadden). Your exact per-SKU duty depends on the precise HS code, which MarginGuard resolves from the live HTS schedule once connected. Not legal or customs advice.
Cambodia is a long-standing low-cost manufacturing base whose exports to the US now carry a reciprocal-era tariff load on top of the normal HTS base duty set by each product's classification. That stacking matters for landed cost: the country-specific load can apply on top of the base rate across many categories, so the duty you pay may no longer be just the historic base rate for your goods, though the exact treatment still depends on your product's HS code. Cambodia has no comprehensive US free trade agreement, so there is no across-the-board duty preference to fall back on, and the representative stacked rate in the box above reflects the current-era treatment. Because rates in this era are set largely through policy action and have been adjusted on short timelines, the number can change between order cycles, so treat it as a snapshot rather than a fixed input.
Cambodia is a genuine China alternative for apparel and footwear and a common first stop when diversifying out of China, but it is not a duty-free escape hatch. It carries its own reciprocal-era load, so the right comparison is Cambodia's stacked rate against China's stacked rate for your specific HS codes, not Cambodia against a pre-tariff baseline. The catch is twofold: the country load is set at the national level, while the duty you actually pay still tracks each product's HS classification, and rules of origin decide whether goods count as Cambodian in the first place. If fabric, components, or major assembly trace back to China, transshipment and substantial-transformation scrutiny can negate the benefit, and any preferential program you hope to use depends on meeting its origin rules. Treat Cambodia as a way to reduce, not eliminate, tariff exposure, and validate the landed-cost delta per SKU before committing volume.
That's a single SKU. Across a full catalog the tariff hits every imported product differently depending on its cost and price — which is exactly why margin damage hides until a quarter closes light.
Paste your Shopify URL. In about ten seconds you'll see every SKU that dropped below your target margin after the current Cambodia tariffs — and the exact price to charge to recover each one. Free, no login.
Scan your store free →Landed cost = unit cost × (1 + tariff rate). To get back to a target margin M, the recovery price is landed cost ÷ (1 − M). For a $30 pair of sunglasses from Cambodia at a 12.5% stacked rate, that means charging $19.69 to hold a 40% margin. Round to a clean price point and test it; the point is to stop selling underwater.
These goods sit in Chapter 90 (optical instruments), usually heading 9004, with frames and mountings imported on their own generally falling under heading 9003. A primary driver of the effective rate is often country of origin rather than the base duty alone: China-origin eyewear can stack Section 301 plus any current US tariff actions that apply on top of the base rate, while goods qualifying under a trade preference may land lower. Within 9004 the rate also depends on what the article actually is at the eight- and ten-digit level: sunglasses with a tinted, UV-filtering lens (9004.10) are generally treated differently from other corrective or protective spectacles and clear-lens readers (9004.90), and value, materials, and whether the lens is prescription can each affect the precise per-SKU number. Because the exact rate turns on the full ten-digit code and the origin, treat any single percentage as indicative and confirm the line for your specific product.
A recurring trap is the line between 9004.10 (sunglasses) and 9004.90 (other spectacles), and it can be misread in both directions. Blue-light-blocking glasses and clear-lens readers with no meaningful tint are generally not sunglasses and typically belong in 9004.90, while a tinted, UV-filtering lens generally pulls the article into 9004.10 even when it also carries a prescription or fashion styling. A second pitfall is shipping frames separately: empty fashion frames and frame components generally classify under 9003, not 9004, so a "sunglasses" SKU brought in as frames-plus-lenses on different lines can be classified and rated differently than the assembled finished product. If you are unsure how a split shipment should be classified, confirm the treatment with a licensed customs broker before relying on it.
Origin is often what moves landed cost most in this category, because the added duty layers tend to be origin-driven rather than product-driven. Eyewear assembly has a credible footprint outside China, with sunglasses and frame production established in places such as Italy and growing capacity in Vietnam, so sourcing the same design from a non-China origin may reduce the surcharge layer that dominates the China figure. Whether an origin claim holds generally turns on where the lens and frame are actually assembled and finished rather than where a label is applied, so confirm any origin claim is defensible with a customs professional before counting on it. Even within China sourcing, confirming your ten-digit code, reviewing order structure, and reviewing valuation methods such as first-sale where they genuinely apply may help, though each should be confirmed with a customs professional rather than assumed.
Are sunglasses and prescription glasses classified the same way for duty?
Not exactly. Both generally sit in heading 9004, but sunglasses with a tinted, UV-filtering lens typically fall under 9004.10 while non-sun corrective and protective spectacles, including clear-lens readers, typically fall under 9004.90. A tinted prescription sunglass is generally still treated as a sunglass under 9004.10, so the UV-filtering tint, not the prescription, is usually what drives the subheading. Confirm the exact ten-digit code for your specific product.
Why is my eyewear import cost so much higher than the base duty rate suggests?
The base duty for this category is relatively low, but it is often not the whole story. China-origin eyewear can stack Section 301 duties and any current US tariff actions that apply on top of that base rate, so the effective rate per unit can be materially higher than the headline number. Model the stacked rate for your specific origin and ten-digit HS code rather than relying on the base line alone.
Does importing frames and lenses separately reduce my duty?
It generally changes the classification rather than reliably reducing the cost, and it can backfire. Empty frames and mountings generally classify under heading 9003, separate lenses may classify elsewhere, and assembled sunglasses generally sit in 9004, so splitting a finished product into components shifts which rate applies and may prompt a reclassification on review. Confirm the correct ten-digit code for how the goods actually arrive, ideally with a licensed customs broker, before assuming a component split saves money.
Is sourcing from Cambodia cheaper than from China after tariffs?
Often, but not automatically. Cambodia carries its own reciprocal-era load on top of the base HTS duty, so the saving comes from the gap between Cambodia's stacked rate and China's stacked rate for your exact products, not from any duty-free status. Run the landed-cost math per HS code, since the answer can flip for some categories. This is general guidance, not customs advice.
Does Cambodia qualify for duty-free treatment into the US?
Do not assume so. Cambodia has no comprehensive US free trade agreement, and any preferential program is conditional on meeting its rules of origin, which depend on where materials and processing actually originate. Consider confirming eligibility for your specific goods with a customs broker before pricing a duty-free landed cost. This is general guidance, not customs advice.
Could goods I source from Cambodia be treated as Chinese for tariff purposes?
Possibly, if origin is not genuinely Cambodian. Customs generally looks at substantial transformation, and apparel and footwear typically have category-specific origin rules. If fabric or key components come from China and only light finishing happens in Cambodia, the goods may be treated as Chinese or flagged for transshipment, which can wipe out the intended saving. Keep supplier documentation that supports the country of origin you declare, and confirm the specifics with a customs broker. This is general guidance, not customs advice.
MarginGuard watches every imported SKU and alerts you the moment a tariff change pushes one below your target margin — with the exact recovery price.
Scan your store free →